Paramedic capstone education model: Building work ready graduates
PDF

Keywords

Paramedic Education
Capstone
Differentiated Learning
Active Learning
Graduate Qualities

How to Cite

1.
Thompson J, Grantham H, Houston D. Paramedic capstone education model: Building work ready graduates. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine [Internet]. 2015Aug.2 [cited 2023May29];12(3). Available from: https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/15

Abstract

SUMMARY

 

In Australia, the last decade has witnessed considerable changes to both the scope of paramedic practice and the education of these practitioners. Notably within education, there has been a national trend to move from on-the-job training, towards a pre-employment, undergraduate university qualification. Despite increases in depth, breath and consistency to the curriculum and delivery by subject experts with training in education, criticism remains targeted at the preparation of the graduate for readiness to undertake the paramedic role. Australian undergraduate courses are currently experiencing unprecedented enrolment numbers, with complex student learning expectations and requirements.  Producing work ready graduates within traditional curriculum frameworks is a challenge.  Capstone courses target the final preparation of the graduating student, with a strong emphasis on articulating them successfully with their chosen industrial settings. While widely accepted in other disciplines, such as engineering, capstone is a new concept to paramedicine. This paper discusses how a capstone topic was created and implemented at Flinders University within the Bachelor of Paramedic Science degree. It describes the differentiated student learning methodology employed and the strategies used to respond to specific student and industry concerns regarding university teaching.

https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.12.3.15
PDF

References

REFERENCES:

O’Brien K, Moore A, Dawson D, Hartley P. An Australian story: paramedic education and practice in transition. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2014;11(3):1–13.

Council of Ambulance Authorities. 2010. Guidelines for the Assessment and Accreditation of Entry-level Paramedic Education Programs. Available at:

www.caa.net.au/images/stories/PEPAP_Guidelines_Reviewed_MAY_2010.pdf

Thomas K, Wong K, Li Y. The capstone experience: student and academic perspectives. Higher Education Research & Development 2014;33(3):580–94.

Kerk S. Capstone experiences in career and technical education. Practice Application Brief No.16. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education 2001.

Berheide CW. Doing less work, collecting better data: using capstone courses to assess learning. Peer Rev 2007;9(2):27–30.

Henscheid JM. Preparing seniors for life after college. Open Campus 2008;(Nov-Dec):21–5.

Brock PA. From capstones to touchstones: preparative assessment and its use in teacher education. Assessment Update 2004;16(1):8–9.

Hurtig JK, Estell JK. A common framework for diverse capstone experiences. Frontiers in Education Conference 2009. FIE '09. 39th IEEE, Issue Date: 18-21 October 2009.

Rowles J, Koch DC, Hundley SP, Hamilton SJ. Toward a model for capstone experiences: mountaintops, magnets, and mandates. Assessment update. Progress, Trends and Practices in Higher Education 2004;16(1):1–16.

Fernandez NP. Integration, reflection, interpretation: realizing the goals of a general education capstone course. Assessment Matters 2006;11(2):23–6.

Smith M, Brooks S, Lichtenberg A, McIlveen P, Torjul P, Tyler J. Career development learning: maximising the contribution of work-integrated learning to the student experience. Australian Learning & Teaching Council final project report. Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong, 2009.

Willbarger J, Howe S. Current practices in engineering capstone education: Further results from a 2005 nationwide survey. In IEEE/ASEE. Frontiers in Education 2006: TIE5-TIE10

Dutson AJ, Todd RH, Magleby SP, Sorensen CD. A review of the literature on teaching engineering design through project-orientated capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education 1997;86(1):17–28.

Todd RH, Magleby SP, Sorenson CD, Swan BR, Anthony DK. A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. ibid. 1995;84(2):165–74.

Collier PJ. The effects of completing a capstone course on student identity. Sociol Educ 2000;73(4):285–99.

Carter H, Thompson J. Defining the paramedic process. Aust J Prim Health 2015;21(1):22–6.

Shepard LA. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educ Res 2000;29(7):4–14.

Schraw G, Dennison RS. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp Educ Psychol 1994;9(4):460–75.

Wood DF. Problem based learning: ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. BMJ 2003;326:328–30.

Coffey A. The clinical learning portfolio: a practice development experience in gerontological nursing. J Clin Nurs 2005;14(8):7583.

Chen H, Cannon D, Gabrio J, Leifer L, Toye G, Bailey T. Using wikis and weblogs to support reflective learning in an introductory engineering design course. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon.

Williams B. Case based learning-a review of the literature: is there scope for this educational paradigm in prehospital education? Emerg Med J 2010;27:794–9.

Sangestani G, Khatiban M. Comparison of problem-based learning and lecture-based learning in midwifery. Nurs Educ Today 2013;33(8):791–5.

Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered. Priorities of the Professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton NJ, 1990.