The contribution of instructor presence to social evaluation anxiety, immersion and performance within simulation-based learning environments: a within-subject randomised cross-over trial with paramedic students


instructor presence
paramedic education
social evaluation anxiety

How to Cite

Mills B, Carter OB, Ross NP, Quick JK, Rudd CJ, Reid DN. The contribution of instructor presence to social evaluation anxiety, immersion and performance within simulation-based learning environments: a within-subject randomised cross-over trial with paramedic students. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine [Internet]. 2016May1 [cited 2022May25];13(2). Available from:



Previous research suggests removing instructors from simulation-based learning environments is popular with students who report greater task immersion and decreased anxiety. However, the specific impact of social evaluation anxiety on students’ immersion and performance remains equivocal.


N=31 paramedic students completed two simulation-based clinical scenarios in random order, one in the presence of an instructor and one without. Students’ distraction and time-to-completion were quantified via review of head-mounted video cameras, anxiety via continuous heart-rate (HR), and performance via two expert assessors reviewing video footage using a structured clinical assessment checklist. One-on-one, in-depth interviews followed with 12 randomly selected students.


Students completed scenarios 1.8 minutes quicker when instructors were ‘absent’ compared to ‘present’ (6.6 vs. 8.4 min, p<.001), approximately half of this additional time was spent interacting with instructors (61.4 sec, SD=33.4). Peak HR was higher in the instructor ‘present’ than ‘absent’ group (121 vs. 116 bpm, p=.035), but no between-group difference was found for average HR (98 vs. 100 bpm, p=.407). Interview data suggested students felt greater stress in the presence of instructors. No statistical difference was evident between students’ performance scores in the instructor ‘absent’ versus ‘present’ conditions (71.6% vs. 69.4% respectively, p=.314).


Students were more immersed, reported being less stressed and distracted, and were significantly quicker at completing clinical tasks with instructors absent, with no detriment to performance. Removing instructors during simulation-based training is likely to enhance students’ immersion and potentially decrease social evaluation anxiety, but immediate performance is unlikely to improve.


Tavares W, Boet S, Theriault R, Mallette T, Eva K. Global rating scale for the assessment of paramedic clinical competence. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012;17:57–67.

Han W, Maxwell S. Are medical students adequately trained to prescribe at the point of graduation? Views of first year foundation doctors. Scott Med J 2006;51(4):27–32.

Hodgetts S, Hollis V, Triska O, Dennis S, Madill H, Taylor E. Occupational therapy students' and graduates' satisfaction with professional education and preparedness for practice. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74(3):148–60.

Romyn D, Linton N, Giblin C, et al. Successful transition of the new graduate nurse. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2009;6(1):34.

Alinier G, Hunt B, Gordon R, Harwood C. Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006;54(3):359–69.

Levett-Jones T, Gersbach J, Arthur C, Roche J. Implementing a clinical competency assessment model that promotes clinical reflection and ensures nursing graduates' readiness for professional practice. Nurse Educ Pract 2011;11:64–9.

Rushforth H. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): Review of literature and implications for nursing education. Nurse Educ Today 2007;27:481–90.

Ruesseler M, Weinlich M, Byhahn C, et al. Increased authenticity in practical assessmetn using emergency case OSCE stations. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010;15:81–95.

Epstein R, Hundert E. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002;287:226–35.

Dickerson S, Kemeny M. Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychol Bull 2004;130:355–91.

Rohleder N, Beulen S, Chen E, Wolf J, Kirschbaum C. Stress on the dance floor: the cortisol stress response to social-evaluative threat in competitive ballroom dancers. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2007;33(1):69–84.

Hardy L, Mullen R, Jones G. Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress. Br J Psychol 1996;87:621.

Dickerson S, Myceck P, Zaldivar F. Negative social evaluation, but not mere social presence, elicits cortisol responses to a laboratory stressor task. Health Psychol 2008;27(1):116–21.

Quick J, Ross N. Does removing the clinician from the immediate vicinity of high-fidelity simulation impact on student outcomes and learning experiences? Poster presentation: Asia Pacific Meeting on Simulation in Health, Hong Kong. September, 2011.

Skosnik P, Chatterton R, Swisher T, Park S. Modulation of attentional inhibition by norepinephrine and cortisol after psychological stress. Int J Psychophysiol 2000;36:59–68.

MacLeod C, Rutherford E. Anxiety and the selective processing of emtional information: mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimulus materials. Behav Res Ther 1992;30:479–91.

LeBlanc V. the effects of acute stress on performance: implications for health professions education. Acad Med 2009;84(10):S25–33.

Bang J. Effects of rater's presence in OSCE station on examinee's scores and performance. Korean J Med Educ 2008;20(3):241–7.

Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Lewis M, Coady D, et al. Exploring the use of videotaped objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of joint examination skills of medical students. Arthritis Care Res 2007;57(5):869–76.

Jang D, Kim I, Nam S, Wiederhold B, Wiederhold M, Kim S. Analysis of physiological response to two virtual environments: driving and flying simulation. Cyberpsychol Behav 2002;5(1):11–8.

Papp I, Markkanen M, von Bonsdorff M. Clinical environment as a learning environment: student nurses' perceptions concerning clinical learning experiences. Nurse Educ Today 2003;23(4):262–8.

Quick J. Physician's model for clinical scenarios – an innovative approach to paramedic education and assessment. Response, Spring Edition, Melbourne, Australia. 2012.

Holmqvist K, Nyström M, Andersson R, Dewhurst R, Jarodzka I, can de Wejjer J. Eye tracking: a comprehensive guide to methods and measures. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.

van den Haak M, De Jong M, Schellens P. Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: testing the useability of an online library catalogue. Behav Inf Technol 2003;22(5):339–51.

Creswell J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (third edition). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications. 2009.

Braunstein-Bercovitz H. Does stress enhance or impair selective attention? The effects of stress and perceptual load on negative priming? Anxiety Stress Coping 2003;16:345–57.

Conroy D, Willow J, Metzler J. Multidimensional fear of failure measurement: The Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory. J Appl Sport Psychol 2002;14:76–90.

Childs E, Vicini L, De Wit H. Responses to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) in single versus grouped participants. Psychophysiol 2006;43(4):366–71.

Kirschbaum C, Schommer N, Federenko I, et al. Short-term estradiol treatment enhances the pituitary-adrenal axis and sympathetic responses to psychosocial stress in healthy young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:10.

Hellhammer D, Wust S, Kudielka B. Salivary cortisol as a biomarker for stress research. Psychoeuroendocrinology 2009;34:163–71.

Bong C, Lightdale J, Fredette M, Weinstock P. Effects of simulation versus traditional tutorial-based training on physiologic stress among clinicians: a pilot study. Simul Healthc 2010;5(5):272–78.

LeBlanc V, Regehr C, Tavares W, Scott A, MacDonald R, King K. The impact of stress on paramedic performance during simulated critical events. Prehosp Disaster Med 2012;27(4):369–74.

Wetzel C, Black S, Hanna G, et al. The effects of stress and coping on surgical performance during simulations. Ann Surg 2010;251(1):171–76.

Jones T, Goss S, Weeks B, Miura H, Bassandeh D, Cheek D. The effects of high-fidelity simulation on salivary cortisol levels in SRNA students: a pilot study. The Scientfic World Journal 2011;11:86–92.

Beaubien J, Baker D. The use of simulaton for training teamwork skills in health care: how low can you go? Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13(Suppl 1):i51–6.

Maran N, Glavin R. Low- to high-fidelity simulation - a continuum of medical education? Med Educ 2003;37(S1):22–8.