Impact of loading and transport on effectiveness of external chest compressions – a simulation study

Reyna Chew, Clare Price, Hamed Moqadassi, Shaun Talbert, Tim Hilliar, Elizabeth Thyer, Paul M Simpson


Effective external chest compressions (ECC) are recognised as being critical for increasing chances of survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The aim of this study was to: 1) determine the impact of movement and transport on effectiveness of ECC performed by student paramedics; 2) provide results to inform a future larger study; and 3) validate teaching methods in an undergraduate paramedicine program.

A prospective cohort design was utilised. Student paramedics performed ECC on a manikin under three different conditions: at ground level on a hard floor surface (ground ECC); at waist-height on a moving ambulance stretcher (extrication ECC; and during transport in the rear of a moving ambulance (transport ECC). Three minutes of ECCs was performed under each condition, with periods of rest between phases. The primary outcome was the composite ‘compression score’ (CS) (%).

Twenty-seven student paramedics performed chest compressions under all three conditions. For the primary outcome comparison of CS, there were clinically significant differences in ECC quality across the three conditions. Ground ECC produced the highest CS (89%; IQR 46), followed by transport ECC (54%; IQR 40). Extrication ECC was least effective (CS 0%; IQR 14).

The conditions under which ECC are performed significantly affects ECC quality. The quality of ECC is substantially reduced if performed in the back of a moving ambulance, and futile if performed on a moving ambulance stretcher. Paramedics should consider these findings when deciding whether or not to move or transport patients before return of spontaneous circulation. Lower than expected CS on hard ground surfaces may indicate a need to review teaching of ECC in this cohort of students.


Paramedic; chest compression; simulation; transport; effectiveness

Full Text:



Idris AH, Guffey D, Aufderheide TP, et al. The relationship between chest compression rates and outcomes from cardiac arrest. Circulation 2012;125:3004–12.

Wik L. Rediscovering the importance of chest compressions to improve the outcome from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2003;58:267–69.

Berg R, Hemphill R, Abella B, et al. Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010;122:S685–705.

Tweed M, Tweed C, Perkins G. The effect of differing support surfaces on the efficacy of chest compressions using a resuscitation manikin model. Resuscitation 2001;52:179–83.

Lewinsohn A, Sherren P, Wijayatilake D. The effects of bed height and time on the quality of chest compressions delivered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised crossover simulation study. Emerg Med J 2012;29:660–8.

Soppi E, Iivanainen A, Sikanen L, Jouppila-Kupiainen E. Performance of different support surfaces during experimental resuscitation (CPR). Heliyon 2016;19:e74.

Lei Z, Qing H, Yaxiong Z. The efficacy of straddling external chest compression on a moving stretcher. Resuscitation 2010;81:1562–5.

Kim JA, Vogel D, Guimond G, Hostler D, Wang HE, Menegazzi JJ. A randomized, controlled comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on the floor andon a moving ambulance stretcher. Prehosp Emerg Care 2006;10:68–70.

Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, et al. Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus CPR including a mechanical chest compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a comprehensive meta-analysis from randomized and observational studies. Ann Emerg Med 2016;67:349–60. e3.

Gates S, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Blair L, Couper K, Perkins GD. Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2015;94:91–7.

Tang L, Gu W-J, Wang F. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep 2015;5:18415.

Stone CK, Thomas SH. Can correct closed-chest compressions be performed during prehospital transport? Prehosp Dis Med 1995;10(02):121–3.

Thomas SH, Stone CK, Bryan-Berge D. The ability to perform closed chest compressions in helicopters. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12:296–8.

Stapleton ER. Comparing CPR during ambulance transport. Manual vs. mechanical methods. JEMS 1991;16:63–4, 66, 68 passim.

Havel C, Schreiber W, Riedmuller E, et al. Quality of closed chest compression in ambulance vehicles, flying helicopters and at the scene. Resuscitation 2007;73:264–70.

Olasveengen TM, Wik L, Steen PA. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and during transport in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. ibid. 2008;76:185–90.

Perkins GD, Travers AH, Considine J. Part 3: adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. ibid. 2015;95:e43–70.

Riegel B, Nafziger SD, McBurnie MA, et al. How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:254–63.

Behrend T, Heineman J, Wu L, et al. Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills in medical students utilizing a high-fidelity patient simulator. Med Student Res J 2011;1:1–4.

Smith KK, Gilcreast D, Pierce K. Evaluation of staff’s retention of ACLS and BLS skills. Resuscitation 2008;78:59–65.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

The Official Journal of Paramedics Australasia © 2018                           ISSN: 2202-7270