Agreement between student paramedics when measuring blood pressure


blood pressure

How to Cite

Hutchins A, Te Momo A, Tran L, Thyer L, Simpson P. Agreement between student paramedics when measuring blood pressure. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine [Internet]. 2019Feb.4 [cited 2022Jan.23];160. Available from:



Blood pressure (BP) measurement is a core vital sign used by paramedics during patient examination. Throughout the out-of-hospital phase of the patient journey, several paramedics at multiple time-points may measure the BP of a single patient. An understanding of agreement in measurement of BP between paramedics may inform the reliability of serial vital signs and trends arising subsequently. The aims of this study were to assess agreement in BP when measured by student paramedics on healthy volunteers, and to validate teaching methods in an undergraduate paramedicine program.


A prospective observational design was used to investigate agreement between student paramedics. Pairs of students simultaneously auscultated BP using a dual-head stethoscope, resulting in 40 pairs of systolic and diastolic measurements. Differences in measurements were assessed using paired T-tests. Agreement was assessed using Bland Altman plot analysis and intra-class correlation (ICC). 


There were no significant differences between measurements for SBP (-1.1 mmHg, 95% CI -3.77–1.57; p=0.41) or DBP (1 mmHg, 95% CI -1.67–3.67; p=0.45). Regarding agreement, Bland Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 1.1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement -17.44–15.24) and 1 mmHg (95% limits of agreement -15.11–17.12) for SBP and DBP, respectively. ICC agreement was excellent for SBP (ICC 0.92; 95% CI 0.85–0.96) and good for DBP (ICC 0.82; 95% CI 0.65–0.90).


This study of student paramedic measurement of BP indicates there are high levels of agreement when measured concurrently by pairs of students, and validates the teaching methods used at the host university program.


Cienki JJ, DeLuca LA. Agreement between emergency medical services and expert blood pressure measurements. J Emerg Med 2012;43:64-8.

Du-Field B. Stethoscope quality and background noise have minimal impact on the accuracy of manually measured blood pressure by paramedics. Charles Sturt University, 2011.

Prasad NH, Brown LH, Ausband SC, Cooper-Spruill O, Carroll RG, Whitley TW. Prehospital blood pressures: inaccuracies caused by ambulance noise? Am J Emerg Med 1994;12:617-20.

Kallioinen N, Hill A, Horswill M, Ward H, Watson M. Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients’ resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review. J Hypertens 2017;35:421-41.

Bilo G, Sala O, Perego C, et al. Impact of cuff positioning on blood pressure measurement accuracy: may a specially designed cuff make a difference? Hypertens Res 2017;40:573.

Boyle M, Williams B, Sawyer S. The accuracy of undergraduate paramedic students in measuring blood pressure: a pilot study. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2014;11(2).

González-López JJ, Ramírez JG-A, García RT, Esteban SA, del Barrio JA, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Knowledge of correct blood pressure measurement procedures among medical and nursing students. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) 2009;62:568-71.

Torrance C, Serginson E. Student nurses'knowledge in relation to blood pressure measurement by sphygmomanometry and auscultation sphygmomanometry and auscultation. Nurse Educ Today 1996;16:397-402.

Torrance C, Serginson E. An observational study of student nurses' measurement of arterial blood pressure by sphygmomanometry and auscultation. ibid. 1996;16:282-6.

Rakotz MK, Townsend RR, Yang J, et al. Medical students and measuring blood pressure: results from the American Medical Association Blood Pressure Check Challenge. J Clin Hypertens 2017;19:614-9.