Improving simulation debriefing in paramedic education: the Paramedic Debrief Model

Alan Wilson, Elizabeth Asbury

Abstract


Introduction

Simulation training is widely used in paramedic education. Quality of debriefing is central to optimising learning from educator-facilitated simulation training. There is considerable variation in the provision of simulation debriefs by paramedic educators, often leading to a varied perception of the quality of debrief by both students and tutors. There are currently no standardised debrief tools specific to paramedic practice. The purpose of this study was to provide a rationale and theoretical framework for the development of a paramedic specific model for simulation debrief, the Paramedic Debrief Model (PDM), that reflects the key elements of optimal debrief practice, feedback and reflective learning principles and that is aligned to a construct of paramedic competencies.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted that focussed on two areas: best practice, principles and models for simulation debrief and constructs for paramedic competencies. Emergent theme analysis was used to identify key components of effective simulation debrief and a construct of paramedic competencies that could be incorporated into the debriefing tool.

Results

It was identified that an optimal simulation debrief transitions sequentially through the elements of reaction, recollection, reflection, analysis and application. The construct of paramedic competencies best aligned with paramedic education consist of eight elements: communication, resource utilisation, ethics, situational awareness, decision making, patient assessment, history gathering and procedural skills. These themes were combined to create the PDM.

Conclusion

The study identified the key elements of an optimal simulation debrief and incorporated a construct of paramedic competencies to create the PDM. The PDM offers an evidence-based, structured approach to paramedic simulation debriefing and has potential to be utilised as an optimal strategy for facilitating simulation debriefs in paramedic education.


Keywords


constructive alignment; debrief; education; paramedic; simulation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. BEME: features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning. A BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27:10-28.

McKenna KD, Carhart E, Bercher D, Spain A, Todaro J, Freel J. Simulation use in paramedic education research (SUPER): a descriptive study. Prehospital Emerg Care 2015;19:432-40.

Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 2003;78:783-8.

Garden A, Robinson B, Weller J, Wilson L, Crone D. Education to address medical error - a role for high fidelity patient simulation. N Z Med J 2002;115:133-4.

Murphy JG, Cremonini F, Kane GC, Dunn W. Is simulation based medicine training the future of clinical medicine? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2007;11:1-8.

Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.; 1984.

Schon D. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 1983.

Gibbs G. Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. London: Fell, 1988.

McKenna KD, Carhart E, Bercher D, et al. Simulation Use in Paramedic Education Research (SUPER): a descriptive study. Prehosp Emerg Care 2015;3127:1-9.

Abelsson A, Rystedt I, Suserud B-O, Lindwall L. Mapping the use of simulation in prehospital care: a literature review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2014;22:22.

Power D, Henn P, Power T, McAdoo J, Hynes H, Cusack S. An evaluation of high fidelity simulation training for paramedics in Ireland. Int Paramed Pract 2013;2:11-8.

Williams B, Abel C, Ross L, Levett-Jones T. Simulation experiences of paramedic students: a cross-cultural examination. Adv Med Educ Pract 2016;7:181-6.

Neill MA, Wotton K. High-fidelity simulation debriefing in nursing education: a literature review. Clin Simul Nurs 2011;7:e161-8.

Mariani B, Cantrell MA, Meakim C, Prieto P, Dreifuerst KT. Structured debriefing and students’ clinical judgment abilities in simulation. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9:e147-55.

Dreifuerst K. Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. J Nurs Educ 2012;51:326-33.

Wickers MP. Establishing the climate for a successful debriefing. Clin Simul Nurs 2010;6:e83-6.

Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university. 4th edn. Berkshire: McCraw Hill; 2011.

Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:1010-6.

Cheng A, Morse KJ, Rudolph J, Arab AA, Runnacles J, Eppich W. Learner-centered debriefing for health care simulation education: lessons for faculty development. Simul Healthc 2016;11:32-40.

Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN. Theoretical foundations of learning through simulation. Semin Perinatol 2011;35:47-51.

Arora S, Runnacles J, Ahmed M, et al. The London handbook for debriefing. London: Imperial College; 2011.

Jaye P, Thomas L, Reedy G. 'The diamond': a structure for simulation debrief. Clin Teach 2015;12:171-5.

Kolbe M, Weiss M, Grote G, et al. TeamGAINS: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings. Br Med J Qual Saf 2013;22:541-53.

Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN. The 3D model of debriefing: defusing, discovering, and deepening. Semin Perinatol 2011;35:52-8.

Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc 2015;10:106-15.

Bajaj K, Meguerdichian M, Thoma B, et al. The PEARLS Healthcare Debriefing Tool. Acad Med 2018;93:336.

Cheng A, Grant V, Robinson T, et al. The Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) approach to health care debriefing: a faculty development guide. Clin Simul Nurs 2016;12:419-28.

Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc 2007;2:115-25.

Steinwachs B. How to facilitate a debriefing. Simul Gaming 1992;23:186-95.

Arora S, Ahmed M, Paige J, et al. Objective structured assessment of debriefing: Bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery. Ann Surg 2012;256:982-8.

Pendelton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 2006;1:49-55.

Smith-Jentsch KA, Cannon-Bowers JA, Tannenbaum SI, Salas E. Guided team self-correction: impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Gr Res 2008;39:303-27.

Jones I, Alinier G. Introduction of a new reflective framework to enhance students ’ simulation learning : a preliminary evaluation. Blended Learn Pract 2009;6:1-19.

Starfield B. Is patient-centered care the same as person-focused care? Perm J 2011;15:63-9.

Stone J. What is person-centred care and why is it important? Behav Res Ther 2006;308-13.

Paramedics Australasia. Australasian Competency Standards for Paramedics. 2011;1-11. Available at: www.paramedics.org/content/2011/10/PA_Australasian-Competency-Standards-for-paramedics_July-20111.pdf

Health Professions Council. Standards of proficiency: paramedics [Internet]. 2014. Available at: www.hpc-uk.org/assets/documents/1000051CStandards_of_Proficiency_paramedics.pdf

Paramedic Association of Canada. National occupational competency profile for paramedics. 2011;172. Available at: www.paramedic.ca/uploaded/web/documents/2011-10-31-Approved-NOCP-English-Master.pdf

Standards New Zealand. New Zealand standards for ambulance and paramedical services 8156. 2008. Available at: https://shop.standards.govt.nz/catalog/8156:2008(NZS)/scope

The Council of Ambulance Authorities. Paramedic Professional Competency Standards, v2. Flinders Park, 2010.

Tavares W, Boet S, Theriault R, Mallette T, Eva KW. Global rating scale for the assessment of paramedic clinical competence. Prehospital Emerg Care 2013;17:57-67.

Tavares W, LeBlanc VR, Mausz J, Sun V, Eva KW. Simulation-based assessment of paramedics and performance in real clinical contexts. Prehospital Emerg Care 2014;18:116-22.

Townsend R, Luck M. Applied paramedic law and ethics - Australia and New Zealand. Chatswood: Elsevier, 2013.

Doyal L, Gillon R. Medical ethics and law as a core subject in medical education. BMJ 1998;316:1623.

Williams B, Dousek S. The satisfaction with simulation experience scale (SSES): a validation study. J Nurs Educ Pract 2012;2:74-80.

Cantrell MA. The Importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clin Simul Nurs 2008;4.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33151/ajp.16.656

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


The Official Journal of Paramedics Australasia © 2019                           ISSN: 2202-7270

 

Crossref Member Badge