How Effective are Paramedics at Interpreting ECGs in Order to Recognize STEMI? A Systematic Review
pdf
html

How to Cite

1.
Funder JL, Ross L, Ryan S. How Effective are Paramedics at Interpreting ECGs in Order to Recognize STEMI? A Systematic Review. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine [Internet]. 2020Jul.16 [cited 2020Oct.28];17. Available from: https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/772

Abstract

Background: The use of an out-of-hospital 12-lead electrocardiograph (ECG) has long been the salient test used when assessing ischaemic sounding chest pain and is the only clinical tool that allows for early diagnosis and triage of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This ultimately indicates whether urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is indicated. Therefore, the ability to apply and interpret a 12-lead ECGs is a key skill for paramedics with potentially significant effect on patient outcomes. 

Objective: This study’s objective was to review and summarize existing literature pertaining to the ability of paramedics to diagnose STEMI via 12-lead ECGs. 

Methods: Ovid Medline, Ovid Emcare and CINAHL Plus were all searched using synonyms of keywords such as paramedic, ECG, diagnosis and STEMI. Two investigators independently screened the titles, abstracts and full-texts of the articles against the inclusion and exclusion criteria and discussed any conflicts that arose.

Results: Of the 2,126 articles initially identified, 9 studies were relevant and examined the ability of paramedics to identify STEMI on out-of-hospital ECGs. Results indicated that increased additional education provided to paramedics, and the implementation of protocols and/or tools demonstrated positive results regarding STEMI recognition.

Conclusions: Seven of the 9 articles had a strong general consensus that paramedics can independently interpret 12-lead ECGs in order to diagnose STEMI, however not all studies were of good quality. While the importance of the pre-hospital ECG in the setting of STEMI is well established, the ability of paramedics to independently interpret them is less so and requires further study.

https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.17.772
pdf
html

References

Ducas RA, Labos C, Allen D, Golian M, Jeyaraman M, Lys J, et al. a) Association of Pre-hospital ECG Administration With Clinical Outcomes in ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2016;32(12):1531-41.

Clemmensen P, Schoos MM, Lindholm MG, Rasmussen LS, Steinmetz J, Hesselfeldt R, et al. Pre-hospital diagnosis and transfer of patients with acute myocardial infarction--a decade long experience from one of Europe's largest STEMI networks. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2013;46(6):546-52.

Morrison LJ, Brooks S, Sawadsky B, McDonald A, Verbeek PR. Prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography impact on acute myocardial infarction treatment times and mortality: A systematic review. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2006;13(1):84-9.

Pilbery R, Teare MD, Goodacre S, Morris F. The Recognition of STEMI by Paramedics and the Effect of Computer inTerpretation (RESPECT): A randomised crossover feasibility study. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2016;33(7):471-6.

Savage ML, Poon KK, Johnston EM, Raffel OC, Incani A, Bryant J, et al. Pre-hospital ambulance notification and initiation of treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction is associated with significant reduction in door-to-balloon time for primary PCI. Heart, Lung & Circulation. 2014;23(5):435-43.

Ambulance Victoria. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ambulance and MICA Paramedics [Internet]. Version 1.8. Australia; 2017 [cited 2019 May 13]. 408 p. Available from: https://www.ambulance.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-2018-Edition-1.8.pdf.

Zoll Medical Corporation. Inovise 12L Interpretive Algorithm Statement of Validation and Accuracy [Internet]. U.S.A.: 2016 [updated 2016; cited 2019 May 13]. Available from: https://api.zoll.com//media/uploadedfiles/public_site/products/x_series/mistatementofaccuracy_v5-pdf.ashx?la=en-au&hash=CE2E8779B3AD012F5583D682CC1CF33CA3D4AA7E

Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Chandra Sekhar G, Thomas R. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56(1):45-50.

Salerno SM, Alguire PC, Waxman HS. Competency in Interpretation of 12-Lead

Electrocardiograms: A Summary and Appraisal of Published Evidence. Annals of Internal

Medicine. 2003;138(9):751-60.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group. Preferred Reporting Items

for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. The PRISMA

Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;151(4):264-9.

Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge

representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:359-63.

Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at www.covidence.org

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Study Quality Assessment Tools [Internet]. Maryland US. Available from https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools

Cantor WJ, Hoogeveen P, Robert A, Elliott K, Goldman LE, Sanderson E, et al. Prehospital diagnosis and triage of ST-elevation myocardial infarction by paramedics without advanced care training. American Heart Journal. 2012;164(2):201-6.

Le May MR, Davies RF, Dionne R, Maloney J, Trickett J, So D, et al. a) Comparison of Early Mortality of Paramedic-Diagnosed ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Immediate Transport to a Designated Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Center to That of Similar Patients Transported to the Nearest Hospital. American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;98(10):1329-33.

Le May MR, Dionne R, Maloney J, Trickett J, Watpool I, Ruest M, et al. b) Diagnostic performance and potential clinical impact of advanced care paramedic interpretation of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the field. CJEM: Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2006;8(6):401-7.

Davis DP, Graydon C, Stein R, Wilson S, Buesch B, Berthiaume S, et al. The positive predictive value of paramedic versus emergency physician interpretation of the prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2007;11(4):399-402.

Hutchison AW, Malaiapan Y, Jarvie I, Barger B, Watkins E, Braitberg G, et al. Prehospital 12-lead ECG to triage ST-elevation myocardial infarction and emergency department activation of the infarct team significantly improves door-to-balloon times: ambulance Victoria and MonashHEART Acute Myocardial Infarction (MonAMI) 12-lead ECG project. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2009;2(6):528-34.

Ducas RA, Wassef AW, Jassal DS, Weldon E, Schmidt C, Grierson R, et al. b) To transmit or not to transmit: how good are emergency medical personnel in detecting STEMI in patients with chest pain? Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2012;28(4):432-7.

Feldman JA, Brinsfield K, Bernard S, White D, Maciejko T. Real-time paramedic compared with blinded physician identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of an observational study. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2005;23(4):443-8.

Lee CH, Van Gelder CM, Cone DC. Early cardiac catheterization laboratory activation by paramedics for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on prehospital 12-lead electrocardiograms. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2010;14(2):153-8.