Soiled airway tracheal intubation and the effectiveness of decontamination by United Kingdom paramedics (SATIATED2): A randomised controlled manikin study



How to Cite

McClelland G, Pilbery R, Hepburn S. Soiled airway tracheal intubation and the effectiveness of decontamination by United Kingdom paramedics (SATIATED2): A randomised controlled manikin study. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine [Internet]. 2020Jul.17 [cited 2021Nov.28];17. Available from:



Vomiting and regurgitation are commonly encountered in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but traditional paramedic suctioning techniques may be insufficient to manage severely soiled airways. The Suction Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) technique was developed to help clinicians manage soiled airways. SATIATED2 reports the impact of SALAD training in North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) in the United Kingdom following the original SATIATED study in the Yorkshire Ambulance Service.

The primary research question was: Among NEAS paramedics, does the addition of SALAD training, compared to standard training, improve the success rate of intubation for the soiled airway?


A randomised controlled trial of SALAD was conducted using a modified airway manikin capable of vomiting. The intervention comprised SALAD training and the introduction of the DuCanto catheter. Paramedic volunteers were block randomised into two groups: A01A02B01 who made two pre-training intubation attempts and one post-training attempt, and A11B11B12, who made one pre-training and two post-training attempts. The primary outcome was intubation success rate at the second attempt. The time taken to intubate was recorded as a secondary outcome. SATIATED2 was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN17329526) and funded internally with commercial support from SSCOR who supplied the DuCanto catheters.


One-hundred and two paramedics (51 AAB, 51 ABB) were recruited between August and December 2019 with 99 participating (50 AAB, 49 ABB). The primary outcome was intubation success rate on the second attempt (A02 vs. B11) which were 86% without SALAD and 96% with SALAD; a non-significant improvement of 10% (95% CI: 1–21, p=0.09). The total intubation success rate pre-training (A01+A02+A11) was 75% (112/149) compared with 98% (145/148) post-training (B01+B11+B12).


NEAS paramedics demonstrated improved, but non-significant, intubation success rates in a simulated soiled airway following SALAD training.


Brandling J, Rhys M, Thomas M, et al. An exploration of the views of paramedics regarding airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016;24:56.

Benger JR, Kirby K, Black S, et al. Effect of a strategy of a supraglottic airway device vs tracheal intubation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on functional outcome: the AIRWAYS-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;320:779-91.

Pepe PE, Roppolo LP, Fowler RL. Prehospital endotracheal intubation: elemental or detrimental. Crit Care 2015;19:121.

Simons RW, Rea TD, Becker LJ, Eisenberg MS. The incidence and significance of emesis associated with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2007;74:427-31.

Voss S, Rhys M, Coates D, et al. How do paramedics manage the airway during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? ibid. 2014;85:1662-6.

Lockey DJ, Avery P, Harris T, Davies GE, Lossius HM. A prospective study of physician pre-hospital anaesthesia in trauma patients: oesophageal intubation, gross airway contamination and the 'quick look' airway assessment. BMC Anaesthiol 2013;13:21. Available at:

DuCanto J, Serrano K, Thompson R. Novel airway training tool that simulates vomiting: suction-assisted laryngoscopy assisted decontamination (SALAD) system. West J Emerg Med 2017;18:117-20.

Pilbery R, Teare MD. Soiled airway tracheal intubation and the effectiveness of decontamination by paramedics (SATIATED): a randomised controlled manikin study. British Paramedic Journal 2019;4:14-21.

Ko S, Wong OF, Wong CHK, Ma HM, Lit CHA. A pilot study on using suction-assisted laryngoscopy airway decontamination techniques to assist endotracheal intubation by GlideScope in a manikin simulating massive hematemesis. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019;00:1-9.

McNutt M. Reproducibility. Science 2014;343:229.

Niven DJ, McCormick TJ, Straus SE, et al. Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review. BMC Med 2018;16:26. doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1018-6

Pilbery R, Teare MD, Millins M. Soiled airway tracheal intubation and the effectiveness of decontamination by paramedics: a randomised controlled manikin study protocol. British Paramedic Journal 2018;3:16-22.

Bullock I, Davis M, Lockey A, Mackway-Jones K. Pocket guide to teaching for medical instructors. 2nd edn. Malden, MA. BMJ Books; 2008.

Jensen M, Louka A, Barmaan B. Effect of suction assisted laryngoscopy airway decontamination (SALAD) training on intubation quality metrics. Air Med J 2019;38:325.

Jensen M, Barmaan B, Orndahl CM, Louka A. Impact of suction-assisted laryngoscopy decontamination technique on intubation quality metrics in a helicopter emergency medical service: an educational intervention. ibid. 2020;39:107-10.

Lin L-W, Huang C-C, Ong JR, et al. The suction-assisted laryngoscopy assisted decontamination technique toward successful intubation during massive vomiting simulation: a pilot before-after study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e117898.

Fiore MP, Marmer SL, Steuerwald MT, Thompson RJ, Galgon RE. Three airway management techniques for airway decontamination in massive emesis: a manikin study. West J Emerg Med 2019;20:784-90.

Association of Ambulance Chief Executives. JRCALC Clinical Guidelines 2019. Class Publishing, Bridgwater, UK; 2019.