This review aims to summarise the literature regarding the ability of commercial smartwatch products to produce an electrocardiograph of diagnostic quality for interpreting Einthoven and precordial leads.
PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE Complete, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched. Articles were screened by a sole investigator against the inclusion criteria – first by title, then abstract, then full text. The reference lists of included articles were also screened. The inclusion criteria were: discussion of smartwatch-acquired tracing of Einthoven or precordial lead accuracy, and demonstrating sufficient rigor when undergoing critical appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute evaluation tools. A synopsis of results was provided in a summary of information table.
Twelve articles were identified for inclusion, nine of which had physician (cardiology or emergency specialty) evaluation of tracings, one of which had statistical comparison of wave duration and amplitude, and two of which were expert commentary. Only evaluations of Apple Watch products were discovered during the literature search. All leads in all studies were considered suitable for interpretation, with no clinically significant differences. Four studies found that 100% of patients were able to accurately use a smartwatch as an electrocardiogram after a brief tutorial.
The current early evidence, based largely on visual evaluations by cardiologists during the previous year, suggests that electrocardiograph abnormality recorded by this technology is sufficiently precise to be presumed accurate until proven otherwise.
Rajakariar K, Koshy A, Sajeev J, Roberts L, Teh A. Increased preference of wearable devices compared with conventional cardiac monitoring. Hear Lung Circ 2018;27:S170. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.06.288
Prutkin J. ECG tutorial: Myocardial ischaemia and infarction. In: Goldberger A, editor. UpToDate Waltham, Mass.; 2020. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com
Coppola G, Carità P, Corrado E, et al. ST segment elevations: always a marker of acute myocardial infarction? Indian Heart J 2013;65:412-23. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019483213001934
Madias J. On Recording the unipolar ECG limb leads via the Wilson’s vs the Goldberger’s terminals: aVR, aVL, and aVF revisited. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2008;8:292-7.
Gargiulo GD. True Unipolar ECG machine for Wilson central terminal measurements. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:1-7. Available at: www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/586397/
Moeinzadeh H, Bifulco P, Cesarelli M, et al. Minimization of the Wilson’s central terminal voltage potential via a genetic algorithm. BMC Res Notes 2018;11:915. Available at: https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-018-4017-y
Avila C. Novel use of Apple Watch 4 to obtain 3-lead electrocardiogram and detect cardiac ischemia. Perm J 2019;24. Available at: www.thepermanentejournal.org/issues/2019/summer/7194-electrocardiogram-and-detect-cardiac-ischemia.html
Isakadze N, Martin SS. How useful is the smartwatch ECG? Trends Cardiovasc Med 2020;30:442-8. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1050173819301495
Fesmire FM, Martin EJ, Cao Y, Heath GW. Improving risk stratification in patients with chest pain: the Erlanger HEARTS3 score. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1829-37. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735675712001210
Colbeck M. Paramedic diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in the out-of-hospital patient with acute, non-traumatic chest pain: the RSVP3 HEART exam. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2016;13(4).
Drexler M, Elsner C, Gabelmann V, Gori T, Münzel T. Apple Watch detecting coronary ischaemia during chest pain episodes or an apple a day may keep myocardial infarction away. Eur Heart 2020;41:2224. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa290/5826159
Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI; 2020. Available at: https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/11.2.5+Search+Strategy [Accessed 14 February 2020].
Lawrence DW. What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? Inj Prev 2008;14:401-4. Available at: http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/ip.2008.019430
Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Can Fam Physician 2005;51:848-9.
Raja JM, Elsakr C, Roman S, et al. Apple Watch, wearables, and heart rhythm: where do we stand? Ann Transl Med 2019;7:417. Available at: http://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/27594/25380 [Accessed 8 May 2020].
Lopez-Jimenez F, Attia Z, Arruda-Olson AM, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology: present and future. Mayo Clin Proc 2020;95:1015-39. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0025619620301385
Leite-Moreira AF, Adão R. Mobile cardiology during the COVID-19 outbreak. Cardiovasc Res 2020;116:e149-51. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/cardiovascres/article/116/12/e149/5912075
Frisch D. A novel technique to expand the electrocardiographic recording capability from an Apple Watch. Am J Med 2019;132:940-1. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002934319302463
Cobos Gil MÁ. Standard and precordial leads obtained with an Apple Watch. Ann Intern Med 2020;172:436. Available at: https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/2756147/standard-precordial-leads-obtained-apple-watch
Samol A, Bischoff K, Luani B, et al. Single-lead ECG recordings including Einthoven and Wilson leads by a smartwatch: a new era of patient directed early ECG differential diagnosis of cardiac diseases? Sensors 2019;19:4377. Available at: www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/20/4377
Samol A, Bischoff K, Luani B, et al. Recording of bipolar multichannel ECGs by a smartwatch: modern ECG diagnostic 100 years after Einthoven. Sensors 2019;19(13).
Sameer M, Niklitschek S, Fernandez F, et al. Beyond Apple 4 Watch and Af - Is artificial intelligence ready to take on ST elevation MI diagnosis? Circulation 2019;140(1).
Behzadi A, Sepehri Shamloo A, et al. Feasibility and reliability of smartwatch to obtain 3-lead electrocardiogram recordings. Sensors 2020;20:5074. Available at: www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/18/5074
Spaccarotella CAM, Polimeni A, Migliarino S, et al. Multichannel electrocardiograms obtained by a smartwatch for the diagnosis of ST-segment changes. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:1176-1180. Available at: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2770022
Samol A, Bischoff K, Luani B, et al. Patient directed recording of a bipolar three-lead electrocardiogram using a smartwatch with ECG function. J Vis Exp 2019;154:2-7.
Al-Alusi M, Ding E, McManus D, Lubitz S. Wearing Your Heart on Your Sleeve: the Future of Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring. Curr Cardiol Rep 2019;21:12.
Foster K, Torous J. The Opportunity and Obstacles for Smartwatches and Wearable Sensors. IEEE Pulse 2019;10:22–5.
Katrak P, Bialocerkowski AE, Massy-Westropp N, Kumar VS, Grimmer KA. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004;4:22. Available at: http://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-4-22
Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JSW, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med 2015;8:2-10. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jebm.12141
Hannes K, Lockwood C, Pearson A. A Comparative Analysis of Three Online Appraisal Instruments’ Ability to Assess Validity in Qualitative Research. Qual Health Res 2010;20:1736-43. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732310378656
Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Heal Policy Manag 2014;3:123-8. Available at: http://ijhpm.com/article_2870_607.html
Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Circulation 2007;115:1306-24. Available at: www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180200
Pahlm O, Wagner GS. Proximal placement of limb electrodes: a potential solution for acquiring standard electrocardiogram waveforms from monitoring electrode positions. J Electrocardiol 2008;41:454-7. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022073608002884
Francis J. ECG monitoring leads and special leads. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2016;16:92-5. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0972629216313092
Sejersten M, Pahlm O, Pettersson J, et al. Comparison of EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiograms versus paramedic-acquired 12-lead electrocardiograms using Mason-Likar limb lead configuration in patients with chest pain. J Electrocardiol 2006;39:13-21. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022073605002219
Roth IR. On the use of chest leads in clinical electrocardiography. Am Heart J 1935;10:798-829. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002870335903477
Larsen KH. Some remarks on the technique in clinical electrocardiography with precordial derivation. ibid. 1937;14:1–6. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002870337903296
Groedel FM. How far does the situation of the indifferent electrode influence the electrocardiographic unipolar chest leads? Cardiology 1939;3:23-35. Available at: www.karger.com/Article/FullText/164631
De Gasperi RN, McCulloh DH. CR leads in cardiac emergencies: a preliminary study. Chest 1991;99:904-10. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.99.4.904
Singal AK, Ramakrishnan S, Bhargava B. An historic ECG from the past. Circulation 2019;140:1437-40. Available at: www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042892
De Gasperi RN, Duncan RC, Lowery MH, Chakko CS, Sequeira RF. Comparison of digitized ECGs simultaneously recorded with CR and V leads. J Electrocardiol 1995;28:287-95. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022073605800469
Elsayed Y. High lateral myocardial infarction: the smallest but the most painful infarction – a case report. Asclepius Med Res Rev 2019;2:1-4.
Harhash AA, Huang JJ, Reddy S, et al. aVR ST segment elevation: acute STEMI or not? Incidence of an acute coronary occlusion. Am J Med 2019;132:622-30. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000293431930049X
Velez L. Mimics of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Emerg Med Rep 2016;37(11).
Veronese G, Germini F, Ingrassia S, et al. Emergency physician accuracy in interpreting electrocardiograms with potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: is it enough? Acute Card Care 2016;18:7-10. Available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17482941.2016.1234058
Ayer A, Terkelsen CJ. Difficult ECGs in STEMI: lessons learned from serial sampling of pre- and in-hospital ECGs. J Electrocardiol 2014;47:448-58. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022073614001216
Nigolian A, Dayal N, Nigolian H, Stettler C, Burri H. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-lead ECGs obtained using a pocket-sized bipolar handheld event recorder. ibid. 2018;51:278-81. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022073617304387
Baquero GA, Banchs JE, Ahmed S, Naccarelli GV, Luck JC. Surface 12 lead electrocardiogram recordings using smart phone technology. ibid. 2015;48:1-7. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022073614003549
Muhlestein JBB, Anderson JL, Bethea CF, et al. Feasibility of combining serial smartphone single-lead electrocardiograms for the diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2020;221:125-35. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000287031930359X