Workplace violence directed at paramedics by patients and bystanders is a persistent and pervasive issue. There is little available evidence supporting the effectiveness of current interventions in the paramedicine context. No studies have reported on potential barriers and there is little evidence supporting opportunities for more effective interventions. The objective of this study was to make an inventory of current workplace interventions and explore the barriers and opportunities for these interventions as perceived by paramedics.
Ten paramedics were interviewed about their experiences and insights into workplace violence. The interview data underwent thematic and narrative analysis.
Seven interventions were highlighted, 10 barriers and 12 opportunities for current and future workplace violence interventions were discussed. The majority of the barriers related to culture in society, attitudes of staff, and lack of capacity for the ambulance service to take action following violent events. The opportunities raised included co-design of interventions, culture change for paramedics and communities, accountability for paramedics and perpetrators of violence, increased ambulance service options following violent events, and improving feedback to staff.
The findings of this study suggest that interventions are likely to be more effective and sustainable if they are evidence-based, co-designed, address all levels of healthcare, and evaluated. Important areas for future research include a focus on consequences and accountability for perpetrators and strategies for ambulance services and paramedics to participate in public health approaches to reducing violence in communities.
Hassard J, Teoh K, Cox T. Estimating the economic burden posed by work related violence to society: a systematic review of cost-of-illness studies. Saf Sci 2019;116:208-21.
Longo D, Phillips J. Workplace violence against health care workers in the United States. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1661-9.
Maguire BJ, O'Meara P, O'Neill BJ, Brightwell R. Violence against emergency medical services personnel: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Ind Med 2017;61. doi:10.1002/ajim.22797
Maguire B, Browne M, O'Neill B, et al. International survey of violence against EMS personnel: physical violence report. Prehosp Disaster Med 2018;33:526-31.
Spelten E, Thomas B, O'Meara PF, et al. Organisational interventions for preventing and minimising aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020(4).
Spelten E, Thomas B, O’Meara P, van Vuuren J, McGillion A. Violence against emergency department nurses: can we identify the perpetrators? PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0230793. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230793
Thomas B, O'Meara P, Spelten E. Everyday dangers - the impact infectious disease has on the health of paramedics: a scoping review. Prehosp Disaster Med 2017;32:217-23.
Pourshaikhian M, Abolghasem Gorji H, Aryankhesal A, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Barati A. A systematic literature review: workplace violence against emergency medical services personnel. Arch Trauma Res 2016;5(1).
Koritsas S, Boyle M, Coles J. Factors associated with workplace violence in paramedics. Prehosp Disaster Med 2009;24:417-21.
Boyle M, Koritsas S, Coles J, Stanley J. A pilot study of workplace violence towards paramedics. Emerg Med J 2007;24:760-3. doi:10.1136/emj.2007
Wassell JT. Workplace violence intervention effectiveness: a systematic literature review. Saf Sci 2009;47:1049-55. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.12.001
Maguire BJ, O’Neill BJ, O’Meara P, Browne M, Dealy MT. Preventing EMS workplace violence: a mixed-methods analysis of insights from assaulted medics. Injury 2018;49:1258-65. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.007
Chappell D, Di Martino V. Violence at work. 3rd edn. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2006.
Krug E, Dahlberg L, Mercy J, Zwi A, Lozano R. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 2004;180:S57-60.
Edvardsson K, Garvare R, Ivarsson A, et al. Sustainable practice change: Professionals' experiences with a multisectoral child health promotion programme in Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:61.
Koh S, Manias E, Hutchinson A, Donath S, Johnston L. Nurses' perceived barriers to the implementation of a fall prevention clinical practice guideline in Singapore hospitals. ibid. 2008;8:105.
Creswell J. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2013.
Kafle NP. Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified. Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2011;5:181-200.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods 2006;18:58-82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
QSR International. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 11, 2015.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.
Corbin J, Strauss M. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 1990;13:3-21.
Labov W. Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative. In: Tannen D, editor. Analyzing discourse: text and talk. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 1982.
Anney VN. Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Education Research and Policy Studies 2014;5:272-81.
Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology 1982;30(4).
Wallendorf M, Belk RW. Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In: Hirschman E, editor. Interpretive Consumer Research (pp. 69-84). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research; 1989.
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook D. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014;89:1245-51.
Ambulance Victoria. 2017-2018 annual report. 2019. Available at: www.ambulance.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/J37607_AV-Annual-Report-2019_Web.pdf [Accessed 18 October 2019].
Ambulance reform. Victoria State Government. Available at: www2.health.vic.gov.au/searchresults?q=ambulance%20victoria%20reform [Accessed 12 October 2019].
Public sector award for ambulance initiative. Victoria State Government. Available at: www.health.vic.gov.au/healthvictoria/dec18/award.htm [Accessed 12 October 2019].
WHO. Violence prevention: the evidence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
WHO. Global plan of action to strengthen the role of the health system within a national multisectoral response to address interpersonal violence, in particular against women and girls, and against children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
Code of conduct for registered health practitioners. Paramedicine Board of Australia. Available at: www.paramedicineboard.gov.au/Professional-standards/Codes-guidelines-and-policies/Code-of-conduct.aspx [Accessed 10 October 2019].
Stirling C, Bull R. Collective agency for service volunteers: a critical realist study of identity representation. AAS Open Res 2011;43:193-215.
Renker P, Scribner S, Huff P. Staff perspectives of violence in the emergency department: appeals for consequences, collaboration, and consistency. Work 2015;51:5-18.
Public Services Health & Safety Association. Engaging patients and families in workplace violence prevention: a handbook for organizational leaders in healthcare. Ontario, Canada: Public Services Health & Safety Association; 2017.
Blando J, Ridenour M, Hartley D, Casteel C. Barriers to effective implementation of programs for the prevention of workplace violence in hospitals. Online J Issues Nurs 2015;20:5.
NIOSH. Workplace violence prevention strategies and research needs. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH Publications Dissemination; 2006.
ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI. Framework guidelines for addressing workplace violence in the health sector. Geneva: ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI Joint Programme on Workplace Violence in the Health Sector; 2002. p. 31.