An assessment of scoping review reporting within paramedicine: A scoping review
pdf

Keywords

Emergency medical technician
knowledge synthesis
methodology
paramedic
scoping review

How to Cite

1.
Williams B, Beovich B. An assessment of scoping review reporting within paramedicine: A scoping review. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine [Internet]. 2020Oct.7 [cited 2020Oct.26];17. Available from: https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/834

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to examine the quality of published paramedic scoping reviews against pre-existing frameworks to assess the extent to which they fulfil the requirements of this methodological approach. Subsequently, recommendations will be presented regarding improvements for future paramedic scoping reviews.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A literature search was performed in six electronic databases as well as the grey literature to identify previous scoping reviews that focussed on paramedic or emergency medical service personnel. Relevant data were extracted from included articles and presented in narrative and tabular formats.

Results

The literature search initially identified 475 articles, of which 20 remained after title/abstract and full-text screening. There was a general increase in the number of studies published over time, the majority of articles (80%) had conducted their scoping review utilising published frameworks, and 75% of first authors were paramedics. Although many areas of these reports comply with published guidelines, there was an overall lack of consistency in the specific information included, the level of detail of that information, and the location of information within the reports.

Conclusion

All paramedic scoping studies should be reported with the use of a published framework to enable standardisation in the reporting, thus facilitating understanding, reproducibility, and utility. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews provides a checklist and thorough explanations of each step in the reporting process and is recommended for use with all future paramedic scoping reviews.

https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.17.834
pdf

References

Whittemore R, Chao A, Jang M, Minges KE, Park C. Methods for knowledge synthesis: an overview. Heart Lung 2014;43:453-61.

Suri H, Clarke D. Advancements in research synthesis methods: from a methodologically inclusive perspective. Rev Educ Res 2009;79:395-430.

Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:1291-4.

Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA. Understanding scoping reviews: definition, purpose, and process. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2017;29:12-6.

Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:19-32.

Cooper S, Cant R, Kelly MA, et al. An evidence-based checklist for improving scoping review quality. Clin Nurs Res 2019:1-24.

Peters M, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13:141-6.

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010;5:69.

The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2015 edition/supplement: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015. Available at: https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/JBI+Reviewer%27s+Manual

Tricco AC, Straus S, Moher D. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) 2018. Available at: www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/Executive-summary_ScR_Dec-9.pdf

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467-73.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336-41.

Anderson N, Slark J, Gott M. How are ambulance personnel prepared and supported to withhold or terminate resuscitation and manage patient death in the field? A scoping review. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2019;16.

Bowen LM, Williams B, Stanke L. Professionalism among paramedic students: achieving the measure or missing the mark? Adv Med Educ Pract 2017;8:711-9.

Chang Y-T, Tsai K-C, Williams B. What are the educational and curriculum needs for emergency medical technicians in Taiwan? A scoping review. ibid. 2017;8:649.

Emond K, O'Meara P, Bish M. Paramedic management of mental health related presentations: a scoping review. J Mental Health 2019;28:89-96.

Fowler J, Beovich B, Williams B. Improving paramedic confidence with paediatric patients: a scoping review. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2018;15.

Horrocks P, Hobbs L, Tippett V, Aitken P. Paramedic disaster health management competencies: a scoping review. Prehosp Disaster Med 2019;34:322-9.

Howard I, Cameron P, Wallis L, Castren M, Lindstrom V. Quality indicators for evaluating prehospital emergency care: a scoping review. ibid. 2018;33:43-52.

Hunter J, Porter M, Williams B. What is known about situational awareness in paramedicine? a scoping review. J Allied Health 2019;48:E27-34.

Jenkins N, Smith G, Stewart S, Kamphuis C. Pre-employment physical capacity testing as a predictor for musculoskeletal injury in paramedics: a review of the literature. Work 2016;55:565-75.

Kennedy S, Kenny A, O'Meara P. Student paramedic experience of transition into the workforce: a scoping review. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:1037-43.

Leyenaar M, McLeod B, Chan J, et al. A scoping study and qualitative assessment of care planning and case management in community paramedicine. Irish Journal of Paramedicine 2018;3(1).

Meadley B, Olaussen A, Delorenzo A, et al. Educational standards for training paramedics in ultrasound: a scoping review. BMC Emerg Med 2017;17.

Munro G, O'Meara P, Kenny A. Paramedic transition into an academic role in universities: a scoping review. Journal of Paramedic Practice 2016;8:452-7.

O'Meara P. Community paramedics: a scoping review of their emergence and potential impact. International Paramedic Practice 2014;4:5-12.

Pap R, Lockwood C, Stephenson M, Simpson P. Indicators to measure prehospital care quality: a scoping review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2018;16:2192-223.

Rasku T, Kaunonen M, Thyer E, Paavilainen E, Joronen K. The core components of community paramedicine-integrated care in primary care setting: a scoping review. Scand J Caring Sci 2019.

Reed B, Cowin LS, O'Meara P, Wilson IG. Professionalism and professionalisation in the discipline of paramedicine. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2019;16.

Sheffield K, O'Meara P, Verrinder G. Decision-making processes when paramedics refer patients away from hospital: a scoping review. Irish Journal of Paramedicine 2016;1(1).

Thomas B, O'Meara P, Spelten E. Everyday dangers - the impact infectious disease has on the health of paramedics: a scoping review. Prehosp Disaster Med 2017;32:217-23.

Thurman WA, Moczygemba LR, Tormey K, et al. A scoping review of community paramedicine: evidence and implications for interprofessional practice. J Interprof Care 2020:1-11.

Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Chapter 11: scoping reviews: The Joanna Briggs Institute. Available at: https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/ 2017

Lockwood C, Tricco AC. Preparing scoping reviews for publication using methodological guides and reporting standards. Nurs Health Sci 2020;22:1-4.

Khalil HBMPA, Bennett MP, Godfrey CP, et al. Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2020;18:95-100.

Mayo-Wilson E, Grant S. Transparent reporting: registrations, protocols, and final reports. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation; 2019. p. 471-88.

Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JP. What does research reproducibility mean? Sci Transl Med 2016;8:341ps12.

National Institute for Health Research. PROSPERO: international prospective register of systematic reviews. Available at: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ [Accessed 14 May 2020].

Jalalian M. Writing an eye-catching and evocative abstract for a research article: a comprehensive and practical approach. Electron Physician 2012;4:520-4.

Brien SE, Lorenzetti DL, Lewis S, Kennedy J, Ghali WA. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci 2010;5:2.

Aveyard H. Doing A. Literature review in health and social care: a practical guide. Maidenhead, United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.