Development of an electronic referral proforma from paramedics to general practitioners: A Delphi study
PDF

Keywords

handover
referral
electronic referral
prehospital
general practice

How to Cite

1.
Delardes B, Chakraborty S, Smith K, Bowles K-A. Development of an electronic referral proforma from paramedics to general practitioners: A Delphi study. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine [Internet]. 2022Jun.1 [cited 2022Oct.2];19. Available from: https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/918

Abstract

Introduction

Currently, non-transported patients who are attended to by a state-funded ambulance service in Victoria and are advised to visit their general practitioner (GP) do not have informational continuity of care, as there is no communication between the referring paramedic and GP. This research aimed to develop a functional electronic referral (e-referral) proforma from paramedics to GPs that can be used to support handover of patients’ clinical information for non-transported patients.

Methods

Paramedics, GPs and digital health experts were invited to participate in the study. The study design utilised an online Delphi technique, where participants responded to three rounds of surveys relating to the pertinence, feasibility, content and presentation of an e-referral tool. Questions were open-ended or requested responses on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

A total of 21 clinicians participated in the study and developed an e-referral proforma. After three rounds, participants agreed the proforma should contain the following information: the patients’ identifying information, presenting complaint, social concerns, vital sign survey, management or advice given to the patient and reason for referral. Stakeholders stressed that the mode and timing of delivery must be flexible enough so that implementing the e-referral proforma does not become burdensome for clinicians.

Conclusion

A structured e-referral system between paramedics and GPs is feasible and offers a method to improve informational continuity of care and in turn, patient safety.

https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.19.918
PDF

References

Australian Medical Association. Safe handover: safe patients. Guidance on clinical handover for clinicians and managers. 2006. ABN: 37 008 426 793. Available from: https://ama.com.au/sites/default/files/documents/Clinical_Handover_0.pdf.

Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Code of conduct (interim). 2014. https://www.paramedicineboard.gov.au/Professional-standards/Codes-guidelines-and-policies/Code-of-conduct.aspx

Delardes B, McLeod L, Chakraborty S, Bowles K-A. What is the effect of electronic clinical handovers on patient outcomes? A systematic review. Health Informatics J 2020;26(4):2422–34.

Murphy S, Lenihan L, Orefuwa F, Colohan G, Hynes I, Collins C. Electronic discharge summary and prescription: improving communication between hospital and primary care. Ir J Med Sci 2017;186(2):455–9.

Ehnbom E, Raban M, Walter S, Richardson K, Westbrook J. Do electronic discharge summaries contain more complete medication information? A retrospective analysis of paper versus electronic discharge summaries. Health Inf Manag J 2014;43(3):4–12.

O’Leary K, Liebovitz D, Feinglass J, Liss D, Evans D, Kulkarni N, et al. Creating a better discharge summary: improvement in quality and timeliness using an electronic discharge summary. J Hosp Med 2009;4(4):219–25.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National guidelines for on-screen presentation of discharge summaries. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2017. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/national-guidelines-screen-presentation-discharge-summaries.

Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 2011;6(6):e20476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476.

Jorm A. Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2015;49(10):887–97.

Meskell P, Murphy K, Shaw D, Casey D. Insights into the use and complexities of the Policy Delphi technique. Nurse Res 2014;21(3):32–9.

Australian Government, Department of Health. The Modified Monash Model [Internet]. 2019. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/modified-monash-model.

Andrew E, Nehme Z, Cameron P, Smith K. Drivers of increasing emergency ambulance demand. Prehosp Emerg Care 2020;24(3):385. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1635670.

Ambulance Victoria. Best care: every patient, every time. Doncaster, VIC; 2018.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Proportion of patients aged 45 and over with a usual GP. 2016. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/primary-health-care/coordination-of-health-care-experiences-2016/data

Downing NL, Bates DW, Longhurst CA. Physician burnout in the electronic health record era: are we ignoring the real cause? Ann Intern Med 2018;169(1):50–1.

Inquest into the death of: Mettaloka Malinda Halwala [COR 2015 5857]. Available from: https://www.coronerscourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-12/mettalokamalindahalwala_585715.pdf.

Australian Digital Health Agency. Practice incentives program (PIP) eHealth incentive. 2019. Available from: https://www.myhealthrecord.gov.au/for-healthcare-professionals/practice-incentives-program#:~:text=The%20Practice%20Incentives%20Program%20eHealth,administration%20processes%20and%20patient%20care.

Hughes C, Allen P, Bentley M. eReferrals: why are we still faxing? Aust J Gen Pract 2018;47:50–7.

Greer R, Liu Y, Crews D, Jaar B, Rabb H, Boulware L. Hospital discharge communications during care transitions for patients with acute kidney injury: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:449. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1697-7.

Clanet R, Bansard M, Humbert X, Marie V, Raginel T. Revue systématique sur les documents de sortie d’hospitalisation et les attentes des médecins généralistes. [Systematic review of hospital discharge summaries and general practitioners’ wishes]. Sante Publique 2015;27(5):701–11.

Axon R, Penney F, Kyle T, Zapka J, Marsden J, Zhao Y, et al. A hospital discharge summary quality improvement program featuring individual and team-based feedback and academic detailing. Am J Med Sci 2014;347(6):472–7.

Nilsen ER, Stendal K, Gullslett MK. Implementation of eHealth technology in community health care: the complexity of stakeholder involvement. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05287-2.

Boel A, Navarro-Compán V, Landewé R, van der Heijde D. Two different invitation approaches for consecutive rounds of a Delphi survey led to comparable final outcome. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;129:31–9.

Gargon E, Crew R, Burnside G, Williamson PR. Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;108:110–20.

Bricard D, Or Z. Impact of early primary care follow-up after discharge on hospital readmissions. Eur J Health Econ 2019;20(4):611–23.

Rytter L, Jakobsen HN, Rønholt F, Hammer AV, Andreasen AH, Nissen A, et al. Comprehensive discharge follow-up in patients’ homes by GPs and district nurses of elderly patients. A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Prim Health Care 2010;28(3):146–53.

Rayan-Gharra N, Shadmi E, Tadmor B, Flaks-Manov N, Balicer RD. Patients’ ratings of the in-hospital discharge briefing and post-discharge primary care follow-up: the association with 30-day readmissions. Patient Educ Couns 2019;102(8):1513–9.

Brooke BS, Stone DH, Cronenwett JL, Nolan B, DeMartino RR, MacKenzie TA, et al. Early primary care provider follow-up and readmission after high-risk surgery. JAMA Surg 2014;149(8):821–8.

Ross TD, Dvorani E, Saskin R, Khoshbin A, Atrey A, Ward SE. Temporal trends and predictors of thirty-day readmissions and emergency department visits following total knee arthroplasty in Ontario between 2003 and 2016. J Arthroplasty 2020;35(2):364–70.

Misky GJ, Wald HL, Coleman EA. Post-hospitalization transitions: examining the effects of timing of primary care provider follow-up. J Hosp Med 2010;5(7):392–7.