The regional resuscitation guidelines for pulseless electrical activity in emergency medical services in the United Kingdom: a systematic review
pdf

Keywords

ambulance services
emergency medical services
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
paramedic
pre-hospital resuscitation
pulseless electrical activity
United Kingdom guidelines

How to Cite

1.
Coppola A, Smyth M, Black S, Johnston S, Endacott R. The regional resuscitation guidelines for pulseless electrical activity in emergency medical services in the United Kingdom: a systematic review . Australasian Journal of Paramedicine [Internet]. 2021Jul.20 [cited 2021Jul.23];18. Available from: https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/928

Abstract

Background

Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is managed in accordance with international and national guidelines. These guidelines are not fully evidenced, resulting in emergency medical services in the United Kingdom amending guidelines to support paramedics when making resuscitation decisions. This review examined the local guidelines of services to identify the local clinical management of PEA, summarise the available evidence and prioritise future research.

Methods

The review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review of text and opinion. The review included locally amended guidelines and cited evidence sources for the management of PEA. A three-step search strategy was applied. Textual data was extracted to form conclusions which were categorised into similar meaning and developed into synthesised findings.

Results

Twenty-two documents met the inclusion criteria; Twenty-seven conclusions were extracted and analysed to generate 10 categories, forming three synthesised themes: the variability in the clinical management of PEA between ambulance services; the early identification of reversible causes and appropriate treatment options to increase survivability; and the consensus for further research.

Conclusion

This review identified variability in the clinical management of PEA; the autonomy of paramedics, which patients to transport to hospital and the factors applied to inform resuscitation decisions. A summary of the evidence in support of the local guidelines found that the early identification and treatment to reverse the cause of PEA was important to patient survival, however, this was acknowledged as complex and challenging to achieve. There was a consensus to improve patient outcomes using prognostic research.

https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.18.928
pdf

References

OHCAO Project Team. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes Registry epidemiology report, 2018. English Ambulance Services. 2019. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/ohcao/publications/epidemiologyreports/ohcao_epidemiology_report_2018_published.pdf

Andrew E, Nehme Z, Lijovic M, Bernard S, Smith K. Outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with an initial cardiac rhythm of asystole or pulseless electrical activity in Victoria, Australia. Resuscitation 2014;85:1633-9.

Wolbinski M, Swain AH, Harding SA, Larsen PD. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient characteristics: comparing ventricular arrhythmia and pulseless electrical activity. Heart Lung Circ 2016;25:639-44.

Soar J, Deakin C, Lockey A, Nolan J, Perkins G. Adult advanced life support. 2015 Guidelines have now been superseeded by 2021 version. Available at: www.resus.org.uk/library/2021-resuscitation-guidelines/adult-advanced-life-support-guidelines [Accessed 11 May 2018].

Martinell L, Nielsen N, Herlitz J, et al. Early predictors of poor outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care 2017;21:96.

Bossaert LL, Perkins GD, Askitopoulou H, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015. Section 11. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions. Resuscitation 2015;95:302-11.

The Association of Ambulance Chief Executives. JRCALC clinical practice guidelines. Available at: aace.org.uk [Accessed 21 March 2019].

House M, Jackson M, Dinning J, McMeekin P. Derivation of a termination of resuscitation clinical decision rule in the UK. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 2017. Available at: www.jems.com/international/derivation-of-a-termination-of-resuscitation-clinical-decision-rule-in-the-uk/ [Accessed 24 September 2017].

McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S. Chapter 4: systematic reviews of text and opinion - JBI Wiki. Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017 [Accessed 21 March 2019].

Coppola A, Black S, Johnston S, Endacott R. UK ambulance service resuscitation management of pulseless electrical activity: a systematic review protocol of text and opinion. Br Paramed J 2020;5:20-5.

Kimmel P, Health. Commentary Open Access; 2015. Available at: www.longdom.org/open-access/background-and-advantages-of-a-tiered-ems-response-in-a-large-firebased-ems-model-2375-4273-1000138.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2019]

Mendeley. Mendeley Support Center. 2019. Available at: https://service.elsevier.com/app/home/supporthub/mendeley/ [Accessed 24 March 2019]

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group TP. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097 [Accessed 26 March 2019]

The British Medical Association the RC (UK) and the RC of N. Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing. J Med Ethics 2016;27:310-6.

Littmann L, Bustin DJ, Haley MW. A simplified and structured teaching tool for the evaluation and management of pulseless electrical activity. Med Princ Pract 2014;23:1-6.

Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, et al. Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade. Report from a National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute workshop. Circulation 2013;128:2532-41.

Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, et al. Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade. Report from a National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute workshop. ibid. 2013;128:2532-41.

Mehta C, Brady W. Pulseless electrical activity in cardiac arrest: electrocardiographic presentations and management considerations based on the electrocardiogram. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:236-9.

Saarinen S, Nurmi J, Toivio T, et al. Does appropriate treatment of the primary underlying cause of PEA during resuscitation improve patients’ survival? Resuscitation 2012;83:819-22.

Arrich J, Sterz F, Herkner H, Testori C, Behringer W. Total epinephrine dose during asystole and pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrests is associated with unfavourable functional outcome and increased in-hospital mortality. ibid. 2012;83:333-7.

Prosen G, Križmari´c MK, Završnik J, Grmec AŠ. Impact of modified treatment in echocardiographically confirmed pseudo-pulseless electrical activity in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with constant end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure during compression pauses. J Int Med Res 2010;38:1458-67.

Nordseth T, Olasveengen TM, Kvaløy JT, et al. Dynamic effects of adrenaline (epinephrine) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Resuscitation 2012;83:946-52.

Nordseth T, Olasveengen TM, Kvaløy JT, et al. Dynamic effects of adrenaline (epinephrine) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Resuscitation 2012;83:946-52.

Executives association of ambulance chief. JRCALC Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2019. Available at: aace.org.uk

Coppola A, Black S, Endacott R. How senior paramedics determine a futile resuscitation in pulseless electrical activity out of hospital cardiac arrest: a mixed methods study. Resuscitation 2020;155:S24-5.

Lin CH, Ng YY, Chiang WC, et al. Variation of current protocols for managing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in prehospital settings among Asian countries. J Formos Med Assoc 2016;115:628-38.

Nas J, Kleinnibbelink G, Hannink G, et al. Diagnostic performance of the basic and advanced life support termination of resuscitation rules: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2020;148:3-13.

Natalie Anderson, Julia Slark MG. How are ambulance personnel prepared and supported to withhold or terminate resuscitation and manage patient death in the field? A scoping review. The Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2019;16.

Kudenchuk PJ, Redshaw JD, Stubbs BA, et al. Impact of changes in resuscitation practice on survival and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resulting from nonshockable arrhythmias. Circulation 2012;125:1787-94.

Ågård A, Herlitz J, Castrén M, Jonsson L, Sandman L. Guidance for ambulance personnel on decisions and situations related to out-of-hospital CPR. Resuscitation 2012;83:27-31.

Paxton JH, O’Neil BJ. When is PEA really ROSC? ibid. 2019;142:182-3.

Prosen G, Križmarić M, Zavrašnik J, Grmec Š. Impact of modified treatment in echocardiographically confirmed pseudopulseless electrical activity in out-ofhospital cardiac arrest patients with constant end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure during compression pauses. J Int Med Res 2010;38:1458-67.

Rabjohns J, Quan T, Boniface K, Pourmand A. Pseudo-pulseless electrical activity in the emergency department: an evidence based approach. Am J Emerg Med 2020;38:371-5.

Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI Approach: grades of recommendation. 2013. Available at: https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI-grades-of-recommendation_2014.pdf